who did you say you were?

Here’s another post from my Guest Blogger, Mother-on-a-Mission.

Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country. Her mission is to perfect the art of being in two or more places at once.

I’ve written before about how much I enjoy a good latte (not too much foam is the key), so you won’t be surprised to hear that I was in a coffee shop recently. I don’t get out much so this doesn’t happen as often as I would like. It is also the reason why I have probably been slow to pick up on a new development in customer service. On this particular visit to a well known chain, I was surprised to be asked for my first name when I ordered my take-away coffee. Usually customers are just the one-shot-latte-to-go or the double-expresso, but on this occasion, the barista wanted my name, my first name. When I asked why, I learned that this was a new initiative to make the customer’s experience of buying a coffee a more personal one.

Personally, I’m not convinced that having a complete stranger holler your name across a coffee shop above the high decibel hiss of the milk frother does anything to make the experience any more personal than a friendly, but anonymous, exchange of order, money and cup. I like to be polite and friendly when I buy things, and I appreciate the same in return, but I don’t want to become best mates with whoever is serving me. Perhaps that’s a reflection of social attitudes in these cold northerly climes. Or it just shows me to be a curmudgeonly so-and-so. Whichever it is, I admit it made me uncomfortable. I like a genuine smile, a please and thank you and an efficiently produced coffee. I got the efficient coffee, but the rest of it felt fake and insincere.

My barista reassured me that I didn’t have to give my name, so I didn’t, and when I voiced some scepticism about how well the new approach would go down, he told me that most people liked it (so far). I retreated into the anonymity of the one-shot-latte but began to wonder if I was being too quick to write off this attempt to improve customer service. It might not be for me, but I realised others might enjoy the first-name familiarity when ordering their Americano or hot chocolate.

As I thought more, I realised there is one terrific advantage to this development.  The barista doesn’t ask for ID to prove you are who you say you are, so you can be anyone you want.

The next time I was in a branch of the same coffee chain, I decided to be Jo. I’ve always liked the name. It sounds capable and sensible at the same time as a little glamorous. The time after that I was Kate. Then I was Lotte. Next time, I quite fancy Ella. I’ve been careful, so far, to choose names that are easy to spell and say but in due course I’m thinking about moving on to something more challenging, Persephone for example.

And this to my mind is the beauty of coffee shops who want to know your name. I can be anyone. I can choose a name to reflect how I feel at that moment or a name to reflect the person I wish I was; a cool name, a famous name, a popular name, a fun name, an exotic name. I can be them all, sometimes all in the same day.

Does it matter that I’m lying to the people trying to give me the best service they can? I don’t think so. The name is just a different way of labelling the cup so I see no harm in it. However, I see that it might be confusing if I was a regular customer at one shop. Then people might wonder why Alice was calling herself Esther one week and Samantha the next.

A psychologist would no doubt say this points to all sorts of deficiencies in my character or some deep-seated flaw in my sense of self. But the truth is, it does no harm to the barista (far better than dealing with a suspicious customer worried about identity theft), it produces my coffee just as quickly, and it allows me to be whoever I want – for five minutes at least.

where are all the women on comedy quiz shows?

Here’s another post from my Guest Blogger, Mother-on-a-Mission.  MOAM is feeling cross…

Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country. Her mission is to perfect the art of being in two or more places at once.

I Used To Be Indecisive’s blog is a lovely place; calm, peaceful, friendly with wonderful photos of far-flung, exotic places, the natural world closer to home and even the occasional small furry animal. Nothing could be nicer and I love it. So I hesitate to raise a serious and downright ugly issue. I really do. However, I can hold my tongue (OK, fingers) no longer. This is something that has bothered me for a long time. It is scandalous and warrants, at the very least, letters to newspaper editors, a debate in the House of Commons and a statement by the appropriate Government Minister.

I refer, should there be any doubt, to the PROFOUND LACK OF WOMEN PANELLISTS ON COMEDY QUIZ SHOWS. Oh sorry, was I shouting? On the whole, I’m a big fan of Have I Got News for You* and I could be a big fan of QI* and Mock the Week*. They have the potential to be seriously funny and there’s nothing like a good laugh to end a long day or a tiring week. But so often when I switch on there’s a male host and an all-male panel. Why?

I have nothing against any of the individual comedians, actors or celebrities who take part. They are often very entertaining. What I do object to is week after week of such shows without a single member of the female half of the population. What is the problem? It cannot be because there are no suitable women and when the occasional woman does make it on to a show, she is just as funny and entertaining as the other panellists. In fact, I’d go so far as to say having both men and women on a show makes for richer and more varied humour because panellists will have a different perspective on the same topic. Surely this is a good thing.

I have to assume, then, that women are not absent from these shows because quiz show humour is something they can’t do. Is it that they won’t do it? Well, no. I’m pretty sure that’s not it either. While women on comedy quiz shows are as rare as a tidy teenage boy’s bedroom in my house, they, just like the tidy room, do exist. I know because I’ve seen them, just not very often. So what is it that stops more women from appearing on our TV screens in this way?

Could it be that quiz show producers think that comedic ability resides exclusively in the Y chromosome? Perhaps because the host and panellists are usually men, only other men get asked. Maybe the programme makers think most viewers are men so they want to reflect their audience in the make-up of the panel. If true, this would be a fair point but I’d bet my child’s beanie baby collection that it’s not (true, I mean). Perhaps the pool of potential guests is overwhelmingly male because men put themselves forward in a way that their female counterparts don’t.

Of all the possible reasons, this last strikes me as the most likely. Do female comedians just have better things to do than hang around a hot TV studio for several hours? Or is it that they are simply fed up being the token woman in a show full of men? You could hardly blame them.

* popular UK shows with panels/teams made up of comedians, actors or public figures who don’t mind being made fun of.

things I loved in childhood – guest post

Here’s another post from my Guest Blogger Mother-on-a-Mission, who writes about things she loved in childhood.

Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country. Her mission is to perfect the art of being in two or more places at once.

‘I used to be indecisive’s’ list of books she has read includes, at number 17 in 2007, The Owl Service by Alan Garner. I don’t recall reading the book but I do remember the television adaptation which was hugely atmospheric and not a little spooky. Our host comments that she was disappointed on re-reading this as an adult because it did not live up to her memory and I was reminded of a similar experience with another Alan Garner book. I enjoyed reading The Weirdstone of Brisingamen immensely as a child (and I thought the title sounded wonderful said aloud) but when I set about reading it with my own children I was disappointed to find that my memory did not match the reality of the re-reading. I don’t mean to criticise the book in any way. I did thoroughly enjoy it when I was of the age for which it was intended but it has made me wonder if we can ever recapture, as adults, the enjoyment of something loved as a child.

Places visited or television programmes watched seem much less exciting or interesting. Clothes worn now just look downright ridiculous in some cases (although my sister had a fabulous pair of patchwork trousers, I think I’d still covet) and toys played with have completely lost their allure, with the honourable exception of board games like Monopoly and Cluedo.

Some years ago, I sought out a place I remembered vividly from a summer holiday as a child. I remembered enough about it to find it quite easily but it was very different from my memory. It was smaller, of course, and less enchanting because the things associated with it – the other people and the small-child excitement of holiday freedom – were absent. Something similar is true of television programmes. I remember loving a series called Survivors; a story of a small group struggling to survive after a modern-day plague had wiped out most of the population and all government and infrastructure had fallen apart. The original programmes now look dated, static and rather clumsy and I wondered what it was that I had enjoyed so much.

However, this change of view seems to work both ways. Things I actively disliked as a child (even fish) are now an entirely different proposition. Books I read as a teenager that were dull and hard work at the time, improved enormously when I re-read them through adult eyes. The Hobbit and Pride and Prejudice are two in particular which spring to mind. Both were set reading at school and, at the time, I thought both were a complete chore. Perhaps it was simply that I read them then only because I had to, while re-reading them later was my choice. Perhaps it was because my view of the world as an adult has changed far more than I realise. Whatever the reason, reading them again years later was a joy.

So is it that our perspective simply changes as we grow older, a product of our accumulated life experience? Or is it that society moves on, styles of writing change, television quality improves, special effects and “visitor experiences” have become the norm so that our expectations are different even if we are unaware of them? Answers on a postcard, Blue Peter style please.

hidden benefits of newspapers

Guest Blogger Mother-on-a-Mission writes about newspapers.  I have included it in my ‘post a day challenge’ -  does that mean I have cheated??

Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country. Her mission is to perfect the art of being in two or more places at once.

The closure of the paper shop in our local town means we can no longer have papers delivered. It wasn’t that a paperboy or girl ever pushed them through the letterbox or even threw them in the approximate direction of the front door, US-style. Rather, the entire order for the area was delivered to a box on the wall by the village hall and each customer simply picked through the bundle and extracted their own publication. It may not sound very convenient but it saved a 14 or 15 mile round trip, which probably cost more in fuel than the price of the newspaper.

Sadly, it means I read fewer newspapers now than I used to. I’m sure I’m not alone. You might be lucky enough to have to don only your dressing gown and slippers to pick up your daily paper from the mat behind your front door, rather than dress in waterproofs from head to foot and trudge out in all weathers to retrieve a usually-slightly-soggy paper from a rickety wooden box. But, either way, the news you read over your toast and coffee is already out of date by the time you scan your first headline. When online versions are only a mouse-click away (or a mouse-click and a bit of a wait, in the case of our steam-powered, rural-community broadband) what benefit could printed newspapers possibly offer?

In today’s wired, online, instant society, newspapers are a tough sell. Who is going to bother stumping up for an inconvenient paper publication with an alarming tendency to slither about all over the place when you turn the page, and leave ink on your hands to boot? It’s much more convenient to read the news on your laptop, iPad or phone. That news is immediate, telling you what’s happening now rather than what happened yesterday, and unless the children have been playing on your keyboard at the same time as eating marmite toast soldiers, you can usually keep your hands clean. Then of course, there are the 24-hour news channels bringing us the news as it happens from all over the world although curiously, there often isn’t any news on these when I switch on…but that’s another blog post entirely.

Most of us expect information on the web to be free so charging for access to online newspaper content has generated plenty of comment. I’m in favour of charging, although I do like the approach some papers have taken of allowing free access to a limited number of articles over a certain period of time. The principle of newspapers making enough money to train and employ journalists of a high enough calibre to research and write accurate stories and so hold politicians and public figures to account and uncover the less savoury side of our society has to be an important part of a well-functioning democracy.  Maybe that would possible by raising revenue online through advertising alone, maybe not. I don’t know.

What I do know, however, is what someone (your host, I used to be indecisive… actually) pointed out the other day. If the dog leaves a puddle on the floor, or the roof leaks, or you spill a carton of milk, you can’t exactly spread your laptop out to mop it up. The alternative would be printing out the sports pages, the business pages, the TV section, or whichever bit of the paper you usually consign to the recycling pile first and spread those out on the floor instead. However, experience tells me that printer paper is not as absorbent as newsprint and spreading out A4 sheets is rather fiddly.

Many newspapers are a good, thoughtful read and offer a welcome break from reading on a screen. For all the recent debate about charging or not charging for online content and whether print newspapers have a future at all in a 24-hour a day society, it comes down to this. I will continue to buy print newspapers because after I’ve enjoyed reading them, they are so useful for other things. I can’t imagine the world without them.

in search of the perfect latte

Post by Mother-on-a-Mission

Guest blogger Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country where she looks after her family, works a lot, comments on anything that takes her fancy and wears pink socks as often as possible as an antidote to a houseful of boys. She’s still trying to work out what she wants to be when she grows up and likes writing because it helps her think properly.

I love coffee. But I’m a bit of a wimp when it comes to caffeine so I like it weak and milky. Years ago this used was something of a problem. Going out for coffee or having coffee after a meal in a restaurant was always a disappointment – far too strong and bitter for my delicate taste buds. I even resorted to tea, of which I’m not particularly fond. And then café latte arrived in this country and I was saved. Since coffee shops like Costa and Starbucks began multiplying in the UK like proverbial rabbits, I have looked for opportunities (OK, you’ve got me – excuses) to go out for coffee or stock up on lattes ‘to go’. However, my joy at being able to ask legitimately for a coffee full of hot milk and not be thought weird has been tempered by my discovery that a really good latte can be spoiled by too much froth.

Froth is the enemy of latte lovers everywhere and some coffee chains, who will remain nameless, are far too quick to serve up a cup of froth instead of a cup of coffee. I am told, by those who know and have been trained in the dark arts of the Barista, that a proper latte should have a small – let’s be clear about this, that’s SMALL – amount of foam on the top, not the half cup that has often been served to me  in restaurants and coffee shops from Inverness to London (I haven’t been to John O’Groats or Land’s End recently but I’ve no reason to suppose the situation is any different there).

I particularly resent the über-foam latte when I have decided on one shot of expresso in a coffee that would usually contain two. On these occasions, I am saving the coffee-chain or restaurant money by paying the same price (because although you pay more for extra shots of expresso, no one ever reduces the price if you have less. That would just be silly now, wouldn’t it?). Surely then, it’s not too much to ask for a decent amount of liquid in the cup.

Being of a shy disposition, I used to accept this situation and grumble quietly into my cardboard cup; but no more. To the acute embarrassment of my poor children, I now ask for a top up of hot milk if my cup is not exactly overflowing. This week we are on holiday in the balmy south. On the way, we stopped at a service station for a drink and visited the coffee shop franchise to collect some take-away drinks. As we waited for my one-shot, medium latte, my son begged, “Just take what they give you, Mum. Don’t look in the cup. Just pick it up and walk away.” Fortunately, I am now quite experienced in what a good, medium latte should weigh so I could tell when I picked this one up that it was quite full of hot milky coffee and not of froth. To my son’s relief I did just pick it up and walk away; this time. But I won’t stop complaining if I feel I’ve been short changed and should any coffee-shop proprietor or server happen to read this, here’s a picture of a perfect latte with just the right amount of foam.

Slainte.


spot the dog

Post by Mother-on-a-Mission

Guest blogger Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country where she looks after her family, works a lot, comments on anything that takes her fancy and wears pink socks as often as possible as an antidote to a houseful of boys. She’s still trying to work out what she wants to be when she grows up and likes writing because it helps her think properly.

The big danger of having a Dalmatian in all this snow is that it’s very easy to lose sight of her. The snow is so deep she’s likely to sink without a trace! I think we might need to get her an emergency beacon on a collar – a bit like one of those buoys that you use to mark the place where a boat has sunk.

Click on the photo to enlarge it.

To help you to know what you are looking for…


just when you thought your moisturiser was safe

Post by Mother-on-a-Mission

Guest blogger Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country where she looks after her family, works a lot, comments on anything that takes her fancy and wears pink socks as often as possible as an antidote to a houseful of boys. She’s still trying to work out what she wants to be when she grows up and likes writing because it helps her think properly.

I’m worried about my neck. It’s not sore or stiff or injured in any way, but I am concerned that when I wake up in the morning, it will be gone, vanished, removed elsewhere. Apart from just being a downright weird idea, this is a rather worrying prospect as I’m rather attached to my neck. Let me explain. I have been sampling some neck ‘repositioning’ cream. I received a mini tube of the stuff as a free sample some time ago. At first I thought it was just an anti-wrinkle moisturiser so when I ran out of my usual cream I decided to try this one out. As the years go on, I become more concerned about trying to keep the inevitable wrinkles at bay. This cream felt nice and rich, smooth and thick. It has quite a pleasant smell too without being heavily scented which was something else in its favour. So there I was, happy as larry, spreading this stuff on generously. Then I finally got round to looking more carefully at what was printed on the tube. (Along with the advancing wrinkles of course I also have to worry about deteriorating eyesight – and the tube is really very small). That’s when I realised I was slapping on neck ‘repositioning’ cream. Among the other properties claimed for the stuff is skin firming which sounds positive enough. But now that I’ve been using it for a few days, I feel sure I’m going to wake up in the morning and discover my neck has been ‘repositioned’ to my elbow, or my foot, or worse still, I’ll find it lying on the pillow beside me rather than performing its usual function of attaching my head to my shoulders.

For once,  I’m actually hoping a product will not live up to its claims but I’ll be sure to let you know if my anatomy ends up in some bizarre new configuration.

on the rack

Post by Mother-on-a-Mission

Guest blogger Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country where she looks after her family, works a lot, comments on anything that takes her fancy and wears pink socks as often as possible as an antidote to a houseful of boys. She’s still trying to work out what she wants to be when she grows up and likes writing because it helps her think properly.

I went to the hairdresser today. I keep reading that a visit to the salon is ‘me’ time, a chance to relax and be pampered, guaranteed to make me feel better regardless of whether anything is actually the matter. However, I hate visits to the hairdresser. It’s torture and only slightly – very slightly – preferable to going to the dentist. At least at the dentist you get an anaesthetic for anything even remotely painful. Not so at the hairdresser. All that scalp scraping, hair pulling and drier blasting is not the worst of it either. No, the most painful thing is the forced conversation. I don’t understand why people who work in hair salons feel they have to try to engage absolutely every customer in the same kind of conversation; whether or not I’ve been on holiday or had a good weekend is really immaterial. And actually, I quite enjoying sitting quietly and watching as they cut, colour or dry my hair so that I can marvel at the skill I will never have.

I do realise the stylists are trying to make their customers feel welcome and valued. I also understand that some people enjoy the chat and are happy to reciprocate. I appreciate all that. But along with the lessons on how to conduct small talk, would-be hair dressers should also learn to spot customers who don’t want to chat. It must be entirely evident from someone’s body language or in the way they respond to the opening salvos about holidays and what you’re doing afterwards, whether or not you welcome such chat. I expect many a hair stylist has complained to colleagues about some customers who are really hard work. In truth, it is exhausting trying to engage people in conversation when they don’t give you anything back. I expect I’m one of those ‘hard-work’ customers. Stylists at my regular salon probably groan when they see me coming. I don’t want to be rude so I answer the questions. But I never ask any and I don’t offer any additional information. These are the two things that contribute most to turning a question and answer session into a conversation but sometimes their absence isn’t enough of a ‘shut up’ signal and the brave stylist ploughs doggedly on.

In desperation, I did once tell the very nice young man who was drying my hair that I would prefer not to talk. The poor fellow was horrified. By that stage, I had a headache. Meaningless and unnecessary small talk would just have been another one. I tried to be kind about it but it felt brutal.

I continue to hope that stylists of the future will learn the skill of telling the chatty customers from the rest so that I can go to the salon without fear of forced conversation along with the rest of the torture. In the meantime, I’m trying to work out how to have “prefers not to chat about holidays or whether she’s going out at the weekend” tattoo-ed on my scalp without interfering with my new hair-do – under anaesthetic of course.

back to school

Post by Mother-on-a-Mission

Guest blogger Mother-on-a-Mission lives in the country where she looks after her family, works a lot, comments on anything that takes her fancy and wears pink socks as often as possible as an antidote to a houseful of boys. She’s still trying to work out what she wants to be when she grows up and likes writing because it helps her think properly.

Summer is almost over here and the schools return this week. That will no doubt seem a strange idea to those of you who are just in the middle of your holidays. The past seven weeks have flown by and now it’s time to look forward to the new term, sharpen those pencils, polish up the new shoes and make sure everything is ship-shape. Unusually this year, we’ve only had a little to do in the way of new school uniform shopping.

As usual at the start of the holidays – which for us is the end of June – I noticed that the shops were already full of school uniform and other ‘Back to School’ merchandise. Indeed, these things had been in the shops for a few weeks already. I wondered then, as I do every year, why it is that many shops only stock a full range of uniform during the few weeks before school term ends for the long summer holiday. Children grow, it’s just what they do. Some children grow like weeds during those long, sometimes sunshine-filled, summer months. Even buying uniform a size or two bigger than they need right now at the start of the holidays means they’ve already used up some of the ‘growth room’ they would otherwise have to see them through term time.

I can see many valid reasons for buying new school  uniform before the start of the holidays,  being away all summer perhaps being the most obvious. But there must be very many parents who prefer, as I do, to buy new school uniform when it is needed rather than have their children grow out of it while it hangs in the wardrobe. Why then, are shops so quick to remove uniform as soon as the summer holidays draw to a close and why are they so slow to restock during the holidays so that parents going in for new uniform a week or two before the start of the new school year find the shelve pretty bare. According to that law laid down by Sod, or maybe it was Murphy, if you are looking for aged 10 school trousers in grey, the rails will be full of aged 5 or aged 16 in black and blue.

I’ve also noticed that many shops do not stock uniform at all from May one year until May the next. Perhaps it is a requirement that shop managers/buyers must not also be parents. Or perhaps there is some economic reason for it which entirely escapes me. My children grow during the year. They also lose things. They grow out of gym shoes and school shirts; they lose jumpers and ties – even the ones with their names on. They fall and tear the knees of their trousers; they spill paint down their sweatshirts. Do other children not also do these things? I know for a fact that some do. But perhaps the people who make the decisions about what clothes to stock in shops have children of an altogether different variety. Perhaps they have paragons of childhood virtue who never lose, rip or stain anything and during the school year only grow the precise amount that will take them neatly into the next size of uniform. And of course they only do this growing once a year at exactly the time when the new uniforms are in the shops.